background image
Current
Controversies
in Oncology
"Current Controversies in Oncology" is a forum for the exchange of views on topical issues in the field of oncology. The
views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of
the Editor or of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
C
A125measurementsarevery
usefulbloodtestsformonitoring
responsetotheinitialtherapyfor
themajorityofpatientswithepithelial
ovariancancer.However,thevalueof
CA125levelstofollowpatientswhoare
inclinicalremissionafterfirst-linechemo-
therapyrecentlyhasbeenchallengedin
astudyconductedbyGordonJ.S.Rustin,
MD,MBBS,andcolleaguespresentedat
the2009ASCOAnnualMeeting.Itiswell
knownthatinmostpatientstheCA125
levelstendsonaveragetoriseseveral
monthsearlierthantherecognitionof
physicalorradiologicsignsofrecurrence,
buttheeffectonsurvivalofthetimingof
re-initiationofchemotherapyhasbeen
unclear.InDr.Rustin'strial,patientswere
randomlyselectedtohaveCA125levels
monitoredforbiochemicalrelapseversus
usingotherclinicalsignsofrecurrence,
andeachofthesesignswerethenused
toinitiatesecond-linechemotherapy.On
average,theCA125levelsrose5to6
monthspriortoothersignsofdisease
recurrence.Theauthorsreportedthat
theoverallsurvivalofpatientswasnot
improvedbyinitiatingearliersecond-line
chemotherapybasedonlyontherising
CA125levels.Theyrecommendedthat
theroutinepracticeofmonitoringof
CA125levelsinthesewomenwithovar-
iancancerinclinicalremissioncouldbe
modified--acontroversialapproach.Itis
unclearhowthisstudywillbeappliedclini-
cally,andStanleyB.Kaye,MD,andMartin
E.Gore,MD,PhD,discusstheissuesthat
affecttheseimportanttherapeuticdeci-
sionsinovariancancer.
TheControversy:CA125to
MonitorforRelapseinEpithelial
OvarianCancer
JonathanS.Berek,MD,MMS
ProfessorandChair,DepartmentofObstetrics&Gynecology
StanfordUniversitySchoolofMedicine
Director,Women'sCancerProgram,DivisionofGynecologicOncology
StanfordCancerCenter
P
H
O
T
O
G
R
A
P
H

C
O
U
R
T
E
S
Y

O
F

C
M
S
P
ASCO NEWS & FORUM
|
9